The institute said “the quality analysis of the lawmakers’ activity showed a situation completely different from that depicted by the strictly quantitative analyses unfolded so far, namely the number of Parliament activities (such as speeches, legislative initiatives) do not necessarily indicate efficiency in activity.
According to the study, on a national level, 174 lawmakers (35%) had poor, very poor and even insignificant activity in their mandate, while 154 lawmakers had an average activity.
However, 159 lawmakers (32%) had good or outstanding activity, according to the criteria used in the study.